SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Inhaled hyperosmolar agents for bronchiectasis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inhaled hyperosmolar agents for bronchiectasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Addressing treatable traits in bronchiectasis through non-pharmacological therapies: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Mucoactive drugs.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010Review
- Treatment of bronchiectasis in adults.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMucus retention in the lungs is a prominent feature of bronchiectasis. The stagnant mucus becomes chronically colonised with bacteria, which elicit a host neutrophilic response. This fails to eliminate the bacteria, and the large concentration of host-derived protease may contribute to the airway damage. The sensation of retained mucus is itself a cause of suffering, and the failure to maintain airway sterility probably contributes to the frequent respiratory infections experienced by many patients. Hypertonic saline inhalation is known to accelerate tracheobronchial clearance in many conditions, probably by inducing a liquid flux into the airway surface, which alters mucus rheology in a way favourable to mucociliary clearance. Inhaled dry powder mannitol has a similar effect. Such agents are an attractive approach to the problem of mucostasis, and deserve further clinical evaluation.
objectivesTo determine whether inhaled hyperosmolar substances are efficacious in the treatment of bronchiectasis SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched, and leaders in the field contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any trial using hyperosmolar inhalation in patients with bronchiectasis not caused by cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reference were identified by the searches conducted. MAIN
resultsOnly one trial was identified, a crossover study of 11 patients with bronchiectasis. The outcome measure was tracheobronchial clearance of a particulate radioaerosol after inhalation of dry mannitol on a single occasion, with appropriate controls. Airway clearance doubled in the central and intermediate regions of the lung, but not in the peripheral region, after mannitol administration. No side effects were observed, but two patients were premedicated with nedocromil to prevent bronchospasm. A further search conducted in September 2001 did not identify any further studies. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsDry powder mannitol has been shown to improve tracheobronchial clearance in bronchiectasis, as well as cystic fibrosis, asthmatics, and normal subjects. It is not yet available for clinical use. Hypertonic saline has not been specifically tested in bronchiectasis, but improve clearance in these other conditions and in chronic bronchitis. Longer term randomised controlled studies of mannitol and hypertonic saline with clinical endpoints are now needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11869647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.