Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11869646›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Cardioselective beta-blockers for reversible airway disease.

S Salpeter, T Ormiston, E Salpeter

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. An approach to heart failure for the public-sector primary care clinician.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  5. Thyrotoxic Cardiomyopathy: State of the Art.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The safety of cardioselective βERJ open research · 2021
    Review
  8. Screening for comorbidities in COPD.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. The Real Role of β-Blockers in Daily Cardiovascular Therapy.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2017
    Review
  13. Effectiveness and safety of concurrent beta-blockers and inhaled bronchodilators in COPD with cardiovascular comorbidities.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Spirometry reference values in the Brazilian population.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017
    Article
  16. Beta-blockers: friend or foe in asthma?International journal of general medicine · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Management of asthma in adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S SalpeterMedicine, Stanford University, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, 2400 Moorpark Ave, Suite 118, San Jose, CA 95128, USA. shelley.salpeter@hhs.co.santa-clara.ca.us
T Ormiston
E Salpeter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeta-blocker therapy has mortality benefit in patients with hypertension, heart failure and coronary artery disease, as well as during the perioperative period. These drugs have traditionally been considered contraindicated in patients with reversible airway disease.

objectivesTo assess the effect of cardioselective beta1-blockers on respiratory function of patients with reversible airway disease. Reversible airway disease was defined as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a reversible obstructive component. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL was performed using the Cochrane Airways Group registry to identify randomized blinded placebo-controlled trials from 1966 to May 2001. The search was completed using the terms: asthma*, bronchial hyperreactivity*, respiratory sounds*, wheez*, obstructive lung disease* or obstructive airway disease*, and adrenergic antagonist*, sympatholytic* or adrenergic receptor block*. We did not exclude trials on the basis of language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trials of single dose or longer duration that studied the effects of cardioselective beta1-blockers on the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), symptoms and use of short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists, in patients with reversible airway disease. Reversible airway disease was documented by response to methacholine challenge, by an increase in FEV1 of at least 15% to beta2-agonist administration, or the presence of asthma as defined by the American Thoracic Society. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data from the selected articles, reconciling differences by consensus. Cardioselective beta1-blockers were divided into 2 groups, those with or without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). Two interventions studied were the administration of beta1-blocker, given either as a single dose or for longer duration, and the use of beta2-agonist given after the study drug. MAIN

resultsNineteen studies for single-dose treatment and 10 for treatment of longer duration met selection criteria. The patients had mild-moderate airways obstruction. For cardioselective beta1-blockers taken as a group, administration of a single dose was associated with a 7.98% (CI, 6.19 to 9.77%) reduction in FEV1, but with a 13.16% (CI, 10.76 to 15.56%) increase in beta2-agonist response, as compared to placebo. There was no increase in symptoms. After treatment lasting a few days to a few weeks, there was no decrement in FEV1 compared to placebo and no increase in symptoms or inhaler use. Regular use of cardioselective beta1-blockers without ISA produced a 13.13% (CI, 5.97 to 20.30) increase in beta2-agonist response compared to placebo, a response not seen with beta1-blockers containing ISA (-0.60% [CI, -11.7 to +10.5%]). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsCardioselective beta1-blockers, given to patients with mild-moderate reversible airway disease, do not produce clinically significant adverse respiratory effects in the short term. It is not possible to comment on their effects in patient with more severe or less reversible disease, or on their effect on the frequency or severity of acute exacerbations. Given their demonstrated benefit in conditions such as heart failure, coronary artery disease and hypertension, cardioselective beta1-blockers should not be withheld from patients with mild-moderate reversible airway disease.

Indexed as

AcebutololAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAsthmaCeliprololFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMalePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSensitivity and SpecificityXamoterolAcebutololAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCeliprololXamoterol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.