Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11869641›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.

M D Privitera, T E Welty, D M Ficker, J Welge

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vagus nerve stimulation for focal seizures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Epilepsy (partial).BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The P3 event-related potential is a biomarker for the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with epilepsy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Article
  10. Vagal nerve stimulation in children under 12 years old with medically intractable epilepsy.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2013
    Article
  11. Myo-cortical crossed feedback reorganizes primate motor cortex output.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M D PriviteraDepartment of Neurology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center (525), 231 Albert B. Sabin Way, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0525, USA. michael.privitera@uc.edu
T E Welty
D M Ficker
J Welge
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USSamford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has recently been introduced as an adjunct for treating patients with seizures. The aim of this systematic review was to overview the current evidence for the effects of vagus nerve stimulation, when used as an adjunctive treatment for patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

objectivesTo determine the effects of VNS high-level stimulation compared to low-level (presumed subtherapeutic dose) stimulation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trials register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2000) and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2000). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, double-blind controlled trials of VNS comparing high and low stimulation paradigms. Studies in adults or children with drug-resistant partial seizures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. The following outcomes were assessed: (a) 50% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency; (b) treatment withdrawal (any reason); (c) side effects. Primary analyses were intention to treat. Sensitivity best and worst case analyses were also undertaken. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for each outcome. MAIN

resultsResults of the overall efficacy analysis show that VNS stimulation using the high stimulation paradigm was significantly better than low stimulation. The overall OR (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) for 50% responders across all studies is 1.93 (1.1,3.3). This effect did not vary substantially and remained statistically significant for both the best and worst case scenarios. Results for the outcome "withdrawal of allocated treatment" suggest that VNS is well tolerated as no significant difference was found between the high and low stimulation groups, and withdrawals were rare. Statistically significant adverse effects associated with implantation (low versus baseline) were hoarseness, cough, pain and paresthesia. Statistically significant adverse effects associated with stimulation (high versus low) were hoarseness and dyspnea, suggesting the implantation is associated with hoarseness, but the stimulation produces additional hoarseness. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsVNS for partial seizures appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment. Adverse effects of hoarseness, cough, pain, paresthesias and dyspnea are associated with the treatment but appear to be reasonably well tolerated as dropouts were rare. Typical central nervous system adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs such as ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea and somnolence were not statistically significantly associated with VNS treatment.

Indexed as

Vagus NerveElectric Stimulation TherapyEpilepsies, PartialHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID11869641
OpenAlexW1605548529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.