SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating dehydration caused by acute diarrhoea in children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Racecadotril for acute diarrhoea in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diarrhea.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Guideline
- Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- The effect of oral rehydration solution and recommended home fluids on diarrhoea mortality.International journal of epidemiology · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Shaping the discourse on rehydrating children in heat stress: expositions from India.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Key concepts for informed health choices. 1.2: Seemingly logical assumptions about research can be misleading.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2022Article
- Acute Infectious Diarrhea and Gastroenteritis in Children.Current infectious disease reports · 2020Review
- Cholera diagnosis in human stool and detection in water: protocol for a systematic review of available technologies.Systematic reviews · 2018Article
- Teaching Pediatric Life Support in Limited-Resource Settings: Contextualized Management Guidelines.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2017Review
- 'First 1000 days' health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: alignment of South African policies with high-quality evidence.Global health action · 2017Article
- Oral rehydration of malnourished children with diarrhoea and dehydration: A systematic review.Wellcome open research · 2017Article
- Evaluation of a Smartphone Decision-Support Tool for Diarrheal Disease Management in a Resource-Limited Setting.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- Comparison of Recommendations in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Gastroenteritis in Children.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2016Review
- When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Article
- Oral Rehydration Therapy and Feeding Replaces Total Parenteral Nutrition: A Clinical Vignette.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) as a model for diarrhea mortality reduction.BMC medicine · 2014Article
- Essential interventions: implementation strategies and proposed packages of care.Reproductive health · 2014Article
- Essential interventions for child health.Reproductive health · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral rehydration solution (ORS) has reduced childhood deaths from diarrhoea in many countries. Recent studies suggest that the currently recommended formulation of ORS recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) may not be optimal, and solutions that contain lower concentrations of sodium and glucose may be more effective.
objectivesTo compare reduced osmolarity ORS with WHO standard ORS in children with acute diarrhoea. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Collaboration Trials Register (on The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2001), EMBASE (1988 to May 2001), and Current Contents (June 2001) were searched. Additional trials were identified by hand searching. Content experts were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing reduced osmolarity ORS with the WHO standard ORS formulation. The primary outcome was unscheduled intravenous fluid infusion. Secondary outcomes were measures of clinical illness. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data. We tested for heterogeneity using the Chi-square statistic, conducted sensitivity analysis by allocation concealment, and the regression approach to assess funnel plot asymmetry from selective trial publication. MAIN
resultsThe primary outcome, unscheduled intravenous fluid infusion, was reported in 11 trials. In a meta-analysis of 8 trials, reduced osmolarity ORS was associated with fewer unscheduled intravenous fluid infusions compared with WHO standard ORS (Mantel Haenzel odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.79) with no evidence for heterogeneity between trials. No unscheduled intravenous fluid infusion therapy was required in any participant in three trials. Eleven trials reported stool output, and data suggested less stool output in the reduced osmolarity ORS group. Vomiting was less frequent in the reduced osmolarity group in the six trials reporting this. Six trials sought hyponatraemia, with events in three studies, but no obvious difference between the two arms. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIn children admitted to hospital with diarrhoea, reduced osmolarity ORS when compared to WHO standard ORS is associated with fewer unscheduled intravenous fluid infusions, lower stool volume post randomization, and less vomiting. No additional risk of developing hyponatraemia when compared with WHO standard ORS was detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11869639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.