SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis in stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis in stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) and resulting pulmonary embolism (PE) are uncommon but important complications of stroke. There is good evidence that anticoagulants can reduce the risk of DVT and PE after stroke, but this benefit is offset by a small but definite risk of serious haemorrhages. Physical methods to prevent DVT and PE (such as compression stockings applied to the legs) are not associated with any bleeding risk and are effective in some categories of medical and surgical patients. We sought to assess their effects in stroke patients.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of physical methods of preventing the onset of deep vein thrombosis and fatal or non fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with recent stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched October 2001). In addition we searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1999, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966- Jan 2001), EMBASE (1980- Jan 2001) and CINAHL (1982-May 1999). The reference lists of all relevant papers were screened for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All completed randomised unconfounded trials or controlled clinical trials comparing physical methods in patients allocated to receive physical methods, applied within one week of onset of stroke, with patients allocated to no physical methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently searched for relevant trials and three others independently checked the results. MAIN
resultsWe identified two small trials which included 123 patients. In one trial of 97 patients, compression stockings were associated with a non significant trend towards a reduction in DVT detected by Doppler ultrasound. In one trial of 26 patients, an intermittent pneumatic compression device was not associated with a significant reduction in DVT detected by 125-I-fibrinogen scanning. Overall, physical methods were not associated with a significant reduction in DVT (Odds ratio 0.59, 95%.CI 0.24-1.48) or death (Odds ratio 5.06, 95% CI 0.96-26.78). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support the routine use of physical methods for preventing DVT in acute stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.