SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis and septic shock.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intravenous immunoglobulin for suspected or proven infection in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive care medicine · 2013Guideline
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Guideline
- Recommendations for the use of albumin and immunoglobulins.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2009Guideline
- The effects of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparations in patients with severe sepsis [ISRCTN28863830].Critical care (London, England) · 2002Trial
- Purpura fulminans in a hyposplenic patient arising from pneumococcal sinusitis.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- High-dose IgG suppresses local inflammation and facilitates functional recovery after olfactory system injury.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Article
- Approaches for Controlling Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection Through Targeting B Cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Sepsis: The evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management.SAGE open medicine · 2019Review
- An IgM antibody targeting the receptor binding site of influenza B blocks viral infection with great breadth and potency.Theranostics · 2019Article
- Group ACase reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2017Article
- Serum levels of immunoglobulins and severity of community-acquired pneumonia.BMJ open respiratory research · 2016Article
- Accounting for Heterogeneity in Relative Treatment Effects for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models and Value-of-Information Analyses.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015Article
- Necrotizing soft tissue infections: review and current concepts in treatment, systems of care, and outcomes.Current problems in surgery · 2014Review
- Prevention of infectious complications after heart surgery in children: procalcitonin-guided strategy.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2014Article
- Considerations in the pharmacologic treatment and prevention of neonatal sepsis.Paediatric drugs · 2014Review
- The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis.Journal of intensive care · 2014Article
- The meta-genome of sepsis: host genetics, pathogens and the acute immune response.Journal of innate immunity · 2014Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeath from severe sepsis and septic shock is common, and researchers have explored whether antibodies to the endotoxins in some bacteria reduces mortality.
objectivesTo estimate the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with bacterial sepsis or septic shock on mortality, bacteriological failure rates, and duration of stay in hospital. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialized register up to November 2001; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library issue 4, 2001; MEDLINE 1966 to November 2001; and EMBASE 1988 to September 2001. We contacted investigators active in the field for unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing intravenous immunoglobulin (monoclonal or polyclonal) with placebo or no intervention, in patients with bacterial sepsis or septic shock. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion criteria, trial quality assessment, and data abstraction were done in duplicate. We conducted pre-specified subgroup analyses by type of immunoglobulin preparation. MAIN
resultsTwenty-seven out of 55 studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis of all types of IVIG preparations revealed a significant trend toward reduction of mortality (n= 8,856; RR=0.91; 95%CI 0.86-0.96). Overall mortality was reduced in patients who received polyclonal IVIG (n=492; RR=0.64; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80). For the two high-quality trials on polyclonal IVIG, the RR for overall mortality was 0.30, but the confidence interval was wide (95% CI 0.09 to 0.99, n=91). Mortality was not reduced among patients who received monoclonal antibodies such as anti-endotoxins (n=2,826 in 5 good-quality studies; RR=0.97; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.07) or anti-cytokines (n=4,318; RR=0.93; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.01). A few studies measured secondary outcomes (deaths from sepsis or length of hospitalisation) but no differences in the intervention and control groups were identified except among those who received polyclonal IVIG, where sepsis-related mortality was significantly reduced (n=161; RR=0.35; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.69). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsPolyclonal IVIG significantly reduced mortality and and is a promising adjuvant in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. However, all the trials were small and the totality of the evidence is insufficient to support a robust conclusion of benefit. Adjunctive therapy with monoclonal IVIGs remains experimental.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11869591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.