Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11869578›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Nebulized racemic epinephrine for extubation of newborn infants.

M W Davies, P G Davis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inhaled epinephrine for the treatment of transient tachypnea of the newborn.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008
    Trial
  2. Inhaled Pharmacotherapy for Neonates: A Narrative Review.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M W DaviesGrantley Stable Neonatal Unit, Royal Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029. mwdavies@ozemail.com.au
P G Davis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing a period of mechanical ventilation, post-extubation upper airway obstruction can occur in newborn infants, especially after prolonged, traumatic or multiple intubations. The subsequent increase in upper airway resistance may lead to respiratory insufficiency and failure of extubation. The vasoconstrictive properties of epinephrine, and its proven efficacy in the treatment of croup in infants, has led to the routine use of inhaled nebulized epinephrine immediately post-extubation in some neonatal units. It is also recommended for neonates with post-extubation tracheal obstruction and stridor in neonatal and respiratory textbooks and reviews.

objectivesThe primary objective was to assess whether nebulized epinephrine administered immediately after extubation in neonates weaned from IPPV decreases the need for subsequent additional respiratory support. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were of: MEDLINE from 1966 to September 2000; CINAHL from 1982 to September 2000; Current Contents from 1994 to September 2000; and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2000). These searches were updated to September 2001 for this review update. Previous searches up to March 1999 included the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, expert informants and journal hand searching mainly in the English language, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, and conference and symposia proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised control trials in which nebulized epinephrine was compared with placebo immediately post-extubation in newborn infants who have been weaned from IPPV and extubated, with regard to clinically important outcomes (i.e. need for additional respiratory support, increase in oxygen requirement, respiratory distress, stridor or the occurrence of side effects). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No studies met our criteria for inclusion in this review. MAIN

resultsNo studies were identified which looked at the effect of inhaled nebulized epinephrine on clinically important outcomes in infants being extubated. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There is no evidence either supporting or refuting the use of inhaled nebulized racemic epinephrine in newborn infants. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: randomised controlled trials are needed comparing inhaled nebulized racemic epinephrine with placebo in neonates post-extubation. This should be looked at both as a routine treatment post-extubation and as specific treatment for post-extubation upper airway obstruction. Study populations should include the group of infants at highest risk for upper airway obstruction from mucosal swelling because of their small glottic and sub-glottic diameters (ie those infants with birthweights less than 1000 grams).

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealRacepinephrineRespiration, ArtificialVentilator WeaningAdministration, InhalationEpinephrineHumansInfant, NewbornNebulizers and VaporizersRespiratory InsufficiencyVasoconstrictor AgentsEpinephrineRacepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.