Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11869051›Full record

ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery2002

Haemobartonella felis: recent developments in diagnosis and treatment.

S Tasker, M R Lappin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Amplification of Mycoplasma haemofelis DNA by a PCR for point-of-care use.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of feline hemoplasmas in domestic cats in Iran.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Haemotropic mycoplasmas: what's their real significance in cats?Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2010
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Infection and blood transfusion: a guide to donor screening.Clinical techniques in small animal practice · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S TaskerThe Feline Centre, Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, UK. s.tasker@bristol.ac.uk
M R Lappin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haemobartonella felis is a pleomorphic uncultivated wall-less haemotrophic bacterial parasite. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences from a number of isolates of H felis has demonstrated that these bacteria are most closely related to species in the genus Mycoplasma, and Haemobartonella and related organisms are currently being reclassified as Mollicutes. Diagnosis by cytological examination of blood smears has been problematic, but recent molecular studies have led to the development of sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for diagnosis. Such studies have also resulted in the recognition of two distinct strains of H felis, which are divided into different groups based on phylogenetic analysis. This evolutionary divergence between strains is accompanied by differences in pathogenecity. This review discusses new developments in the diagnosis and treatment of H felis, focusing on the use of, and interpretation of, PCR assays.

Indexed as

AnaplasmataceaeAnaplasmataceae InfectionsAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID11869051
PMCPMC10829151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.