Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11867474›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2002

Rapid measurement of protein osmotic second virial coefficients by self-interaction chromatography.

Peter M Tessier, Abraham M Lenhoff, Stanley I Sandler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative Perspectives of Biomolecular Crystallization Thermodynamics.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Discontinuous Potential Model for Protein-Protein Interactions.Foundations of Molecular Modeling and Simulation : select papers from FOMMS 2015. International Conference on Foundations of Molecular Modeling and Simulation (6th : 2015 : Mount Hood, Or.) · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The second virial coefficient as a predictor of protein aggregation propensity: A self-interaction chromatography study.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Membrane proteins, detergents and crystals: what is the state of the art?Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2014
    Review
  20. Protein solubilization: a novel approach.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M TessierCenter for Molecular and Engineering Thermodynamics, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
Abraham M Lenhoff
Stanley I Sandler
University of Delaware · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weak protein interactions are often characterized in terms of the osmotic second virial coefficient (B(22)), which has been shown to correlate with protein phase behavior, such as crystallization. Traditional methods for measuring B(22), such as static light scattering, are too expensive in terms of both time and protein to allow extensive exploration of the effects of solution conditions on B(22). In this work we have measured protein interactions using self-interaction chromatography, in which protein is immobilized on chromatographic particles and the retention of the same protein is measured in isocratic elution. The relative retention of the protein reflects the average protein interactions, which we have related to the second virial coefficient via statistical mechanics. We obtain quantitative agreement between virial coefficients measured by self-interaction chromatography and traditional characterization methods for both lysozyme and chymotrypsinogen over a wide range of pH and ionic strengths, yet self-interaction chromatography requires at least an order of magnitude less time and protein than other methods. The method thus holds significant promise for the characterization of protein interactions requiring only commonly available laboratory equipment, little specialized expertise, and relatively small investments of both time and protein.

Indexed as

BiophysicsOsmosisAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaCattleCell MembraneChickensChromatographyChymotrypsinogenHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLightModels, StatisticalMuramidaseProtein BindingScattering, RadiationChymotrypsinogenMuramidase

Identifiers

PMID11867474
PMCPMC1301960
OpenAlexW2069616361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.