Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11863073›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2002

Chromosome sorting and PCR-based physical mapping in pea (Pisum sativum L.).

Pavel Neumann, Dana Pozárková, Jan Vrána, Jaroslav Dolezel, Jirí Macas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. KNL1 and NDC80 represent new universal markers for the detection of functional centromeres in plants.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Flow Cytometric Analysis and Sorting of Plant Chromosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chromosome analysis and sorting.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Cytogenetics ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Chromosomes in the flow to simplify genome analysis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Integration of genetic and physical maps of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome using flow-sorted chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavel NeumannInstitute of Plant Molecular Biology, Ceské Budĕjovice, Czech Republic. neumann@umbr.cas.cz
Dana Pozárková
Jan Vrána
Jaroslav Dolezel
Jirí Macas
Institute of Plant Molecular Biology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three pea lines with reconstructed karyotypes were used for analysis and subsequent purification of individual chromosome types using flow cytometry and sorting. The lines JI 145, JI 146, and JI 148 possess defined chromosomal translocations allowing discrimination of three to four chromosome types from each line based on the different sizes of translocation chromosomes. Whereas only two chromosomes could be sorted from standard (wild-type) karyotype, a combined use of these lines allowed sorting of six out of the seven types of pea chromosomes. Chromosomes were identified and purity of flow-sorted fractions was assessed using fluorescence in-situ hybridization with a PisTR-B probe that was previously shown to give labelling patterns characteristic for each chromosome type. The fractions of flow-sorted chromosomes were of very high purity (> 95%) and proved to be suitable for detection of gene and marker sequences using PCR with specific primers. Three fractions containing chromosomes 27, 72 and a pool of all remaining chromosomes (1, 3, 4, 5, 6) flow-sorted from the line JI 148 were then used for PCR-based physical localization of genetic markers selected from linkage groups IV and VII. These experiments enabled assignment of the linkage groups IV and VII to chromosomes 4 and 7, respectively.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingBase SequenceDNA PrimersIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingPisum sativumPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID11863073
OpenAlexW24036813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.