Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11861556›Full record

ArticleGenetics2002

Patterns of genetic variation at a chromosome 4 locus of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Mark A Jensen, Brian Charlesworth, Martin Kreitman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A JensenDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1573, USA.
Brian Charlesworth
Martin Kreitman
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA sequence surveys of Drosophila melanogaster populations show a strong positive correlation between the recombination rate experienced by a locus and its level of nucleotide polymorphism. In particular, surveys of the fourth chromosome gene ci(D) show greatly reduced levels of nucleotide variation; this observation was originally interpreted in terms of selective sweeps occurring on the nonrecombining fourth chromosome. Subsequent theoretical work has, however, uncovered several other selective processes that can reduce variation. In this study, we revisit the Drosophila fourth chromosome, investigating variation in 5-6 kb of the gene ankyrin in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Silent nucleotide site diversity is approximately 5 x 10(-4) for both species, consistent with the previous observations of low variation at ci(D). Given the observed frequency spectra at ankyrin, coalescent simulations indicate that reduced diversity in the region is unlikely to be due to a selective sweep alone. We find evidence for recombinational exchange at this locus, and both species appear to be fixed for an insertion of the transposable element HB in an intron of ankyrin.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAnkyrinsChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterFemalePolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSequence AlignmentAnkyrinsDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID11861556
PMCPMC1461959
OpenAlexW2155483645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.