Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11861552›Full record

ArticleGenetics2002

Dimorphic mating-type chromosomes in the fungus Microbotryum violaceum.

Michael E Hood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Hungry for Sex: Differential Roles forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evolutionary strata on young mating-type chromosomes despite the lack of sexual antagonism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Fungal Sex: The Basidiomycota.Microbiology spectrum · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael E HoodDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, USA. michael.hood@virginia.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi often mate as haploids, and sex chromosomes (i.e., mating-type chromosomes) that are dimorphic for their size or overall DNA content have never been reported in this kingdom. Using electrophoretic techniques for karyotype analysis, a highly dimorphic chromosome pair that determines mating compatibility is shown to occur in populations of the fungus Microbotryum violaceum. This substantiates the evolution of such dimorphism as a general feature associated with haploid determination of mating compatibility, which previously had been known only in haplodioecious plants (mosses and liverworts). Size-dimorphic sex chromosomes are present in a lineage of M. violaceum native to Europe, as well as a lineage native to North America. However, they are very different in size between these lineages, indicating either independent evolution of the dimorphism or a large degree of divergence since their isolation. Several DNA sequences that show sequence similarity to transposons were isolated from these sex chromosomes.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalGenes, Mating Type, FungalBasidiomycotaSex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID11861552
PMCPMC1461988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.