Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11860209›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2002

Recombinase-directed plant transformation for the post-genomic era.

David W Ow

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeted DNA insertion in plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Gene stacking by recombinases.Plant biotechnology journal · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W OwPlant Gene Expression Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA 94710, USA. ow@pgec.ars.usda.gov
Agricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genomics promises to accelerate genetic discoveries for plant improvements. Machine-driven technologies are ushering in gene structural and expressional data at an unprecedented rate. Potential bottlenecks in this crop improvement process are steps involving plant transformation. With few exceptions, genetic transformation is an obligatory final step by which useful traits are engineered into plants. In addition, transgenesis is most often needed to confirm gene function, after deductions made through comparative genomics, expression profiles, and mutation analysis. This article reviews the use of recombinase systems to deliver DNA more efficiently into the plant genome.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantIntegrasesTransformation, GeneticBase SequenceDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA, PlantGenetic VectorsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinasesRecombination, GeneticSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA, PlantIntegrasesintegron integrase IntI1Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID11860209
OpenAlexW1531658444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.