Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11857073›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2002

Efficacy of recombinant adenovirus as vector for allergen gene therapy in a mouse model of type I allergy.

S Sudowe, E Montermann, J Steitz, T Tüting, J Knop, A B Reske-Kunz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S SudoweClinical Research Unit Allergology, Department of Dermatology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
E Montermann
J Steitz
T Tüting
J Knop
A B Reske-Kunz
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-based immunization represents an attractive alternative approach to the current treatment of allergic diseases by specific immunotherapy with allergen extracts. In this study, we used a replication-deficient adenovirus vector (AdCMV), to examine the in vivo efficacy of preventive and therapeutic genetic immunization in a mouse model of type I allergy. Primary immunization with a recombinant adenovirus expressing the model antigen beta-galactosidase (AdCMV-(beta)gal) induced a Th1 immune response (predominance of IgG2a antibodies, high frequency of IFN-gamma producing T cells) and large numbers of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Prophylactic vaccination with AdCMV-(beta)gal abolished the production of specific IgE following subsequent immunization with (beta)gal-protein, and skewed the Th2-biased immune response to a Th1-orientated response. In contrast, therapeutic administration of AdCMV-(beta)gal after priming with (beta)gal-protein neither significantly inhibited ongoing IgE production nor modulated a manifest Th2 immune response. Thus, allergen gene transfer via recombinant adenovirus represents an effective method to establish protection against the development of allergic disorders, but does not qualify as a therapeutic tool to interfere with ongoing high IgE production.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAllergensAnimalsbeta-GalactosidaseCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHypersensitivity, ImmediateImmunizationImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CTh1 CellsAllergensbeta-GalactosidaseImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID11857073
OpenAlexW2313909841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.