Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11857017›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2002

Birth weight as a predictor of breast cancer: a case-control study in Norway.

L J Vatten, B O Maehle, T I Lund Nilsen, S Tretli, C-c Hsieh, D Trichopoulos, S O Stuver

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fetal origins of adult disease.Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · 2011
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Birth weight and breast cancer risk.British journal of cancer · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L J VattenDepartment of Community Medicine and General Practice, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway. lars.vatten@medisin.ntnu.no
B O Maehle
T I Lund Nilsen
S Tretli
C-c Hsieh
D Trichopoulos
S O Stuver
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOCancer Registry of Norway · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

PERINATAL FACTORS AND BREAST CANCERR01CA078761 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI TRICHOPOULOS, DIMITRIOS V · 1999 to 2000
$152k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 78761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis that birth weight is positively associated with adult risk of breast cancer implies that factors related to intrauterine growth may be important for the development of this malignancy. Using stored birth records from the two main hospitals in Trondheim and Bergen, Norway, we collected information on birth weight, birth length and placenta weight among 373 women who developed breast cancer. From the same archives, we selected as controls 1150 women of identical age as the cases without a history of breast cancer. Information on age at first birth and parity were collected from the Central Person Registry in Norway. Based on conditional logistic regression analysis, breast cancer risk was positively associated with birth weight and with birth length (P for trend=0.02). Birth weights in the highest quartile (3730 g or more) were associated with 40% higher risk (odds ratio, 1.4, 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.9) of breast cancer compared to birth weights in the lowest quartile (less than 3090 g). For birth length, the odds ratio for women who were 51.5 cm or more (highest quartile) was 1.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8) compared to being less than 50 cm (lowest quartile) at birth. Adjustment for age at first birth and parity did not change these estimates. Placenta weight was not associated with breast cancer risk. This study provides strong evidence that intrauterine factors may influence future risk of breast cancer. A common feature of such factors would be their ability to stimulate foetal growth and, simultaneously, to influence intrauterine development of the mammary gland.

Indexed as

Birth WeightAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedOrgan SizePlacentaSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID11857017
PMCPMC2746526
OpenAlexW1990382173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.