ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2001
A comparison of smoking habits, beliefs and attitudes among Tuscan student nurses in 1992 and 1999.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Self-rated health, work characteristics and health related behaviours among nurses in Greece: a cross sectional study.BMC nursing · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two-hundred-and-fifty students (aged 24+/-4 years, mean +/- SD, females were 75%) attending the first year of training in Florence Nursing School in 1991-1992 and 205 ones (aged 22+/-4 years; females 83% of the total) in the first year course of Nursing Schools of the Universities of Siena and Florence in 1998-1999 answered the same anonymous, self-administered questionnaire about their smoking habits, beliefs and attitudes. The overall response rate was 92% in 1992 and 88% in 1999. In 1992 and 1999, respectively, exsmokers were 13 and 11%, current smokers 51 and 43%. Ten percent of nurses who smoked in 1992 and 16% in 1999 were occasional smokers. The average daily number of cigarettes among respondents who smoked was lower in 1999. For both the surveys the beliefs about tobacco smoking remained generic and more often drawn from unspecific sources of information. Compared to 1992, in 1999 student nurses improved some attitudes towards smoking, such as the increased awareness that smoking cessation methods may be useful to quit and that hospital should be smoke-free. These positive attitudes did not change their smoking habits and the opinion on their ongoing smoking habits. Student nurses also did not obtain a consistently increased awareness about their role for advising subjects who smoked against smoking. We conclude that from 1992 to 1999 in Tuscany the smoking habits of first year student nurses changed little and remained high. There is a need for targeting antismoking education and for including specific training about tobacco smoking in the curricula of Italian nurse schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.