Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11854502›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

Hotspots and the conservation of evolutionary history.

Wes Sechrest, Thomas M Brooks, Gustavo A B da Fonseca, William R Konstant, Russell A Mittermeier, Andy Purvis, Anthony B Rylands, John L Gittleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Migration patterns ofEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fossils, phylogenies, and the challenge of preserving evolutionary history in the face of anthropogenic extinctions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  19. Incorporating evolutionary history into conservation planning in biodiversity hotspots.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  20. Why and how might genetic and phylogenetic diversity be reflected in the identification of key biodiversity areas?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wes SechrestDepartment of Biology, Gilmer Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA.
Thomas M Brooks
Gustavo A B da Fonseca
William R Konstant
Russell A Mittermeier
Andy Purvis
Anthony B Rylands
John L Gittleman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species diversity is unevenly distributed across the globe, with terrestrial diversity concentrated in a few restricted biodiversity hotspots. These areas are associated with high losses of primary vegetation and increased human population density, resulting in growing numbers of threatened species. We show that conservation of these hotspots is critical because they harbor even greater amounts of evolutionary history than expected by species numbers alone. We used supertrees for carnivores and primates to estimate that nearly 70% of the total amount of evolutionary history represented in these groups is found in 25 biodiversity hotspots.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMutationAnimalsClassificationExtinction, PsychologicalPhylogenyPrimatesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID11854502
PMCPMC122320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.