Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11851635›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2002

The promise of new antiepileptic drugs.

John S Duncan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Treatment of infantile spasms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Use and safety profile of antiepileptic drugs in Italy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007
    Article
  10. Management of seizures in critically ill patients.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John S DuncanNSE-UCL Epilepsy Centre, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, SL9 0LR, UK. j.duncan@ion.ucl.ac.uk

Funding

Medical Research Council G9805989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is the most common serious disorder of the brain and comprises a wide range of different conditions with varying aetiologies. The long-established antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) control seizures in 50% of patients developing partial seizures, and 60-70% of those developing generalized seizures. Several AEDs were made available in the 1990s. These drugs have efficacy, but have had only a modest impact on those with refractory epilepsies. A 50% seizure reduction, which is commonly used as an endpoint in clinical trials, confers little benefit to a patient. Of the newer AEDs, lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine are now licensed for use as monotherapy and vigabatrin has a monotherapy licence for infantile spasms. Careful and prolonged postmarketing surveillance is essential to detect adverse effects, which may not be evident in premarketing clinical trials. At this time, there are 10 AEDs currently in varying stages of clinical development. Current strategies for selecting an AED for a particular patient are crude. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic measures of cerebral neuro-transmitters and genetic analysis may allow better prediction of which drug is most likely to be efficacious and to have low risk of adverse effects. Present AEDs suppress the occurrence of seizures. Agents that prevent the development of epilepsy and which protect the brain from the consequences of seizures would be of great value, but it will be difficult to prove their effectiveness. At present AEDs are given continually and systemically. Local drug delivery is feasible and could avoid the adverse effects of AEDs. The combination of local drug delivery with prediction of seizure occurrence could revolutionize the treatment of currently refractory epilepsies.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsHumansSeizuresStatus EpilepticusAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID11851635
PMCPMC1874286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.