Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11850792›Full record

ReviewOncogene2002

Telomerase: its clinical relevance in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Markus Müller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Activating TelomeraseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The current role of telomerase in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2009
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Markus MüllerDepartment of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universität Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany. m.mueller@medizin.fu-berlin.de
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 50 years ago, Papanicolaou recognized the importance of a non-invasive technique for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Cystoscopy, however, has remained the 'gold standard' since no currently available non-invasive method can compete with cystoscopy's sensitivity and specificity. The detection of the ribonucleoprotein telomerase or the telomerase subunits human telomerase RNA (hTR) and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in urine samples offer new diagnostic perspectives. The present article presents a review of publications in the literature and evaluates their clinical relevance. The experimental studies reported to date are very promising and show that telomerase exactly fulfils the requirements for a good diagnostic marker for carcinoma of the urinary bladder. The diagnostic application remains in an experimental stage and telomerase is still several steps away for routine use as a clinical parameter. The remaining steps leading to its routine clinical application will be discussed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinomaClinical Enzyme TestsDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNATelomeraseUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsRNATelomerasetelomerase RNA

Identifiers

PMID11850792
OpenAlexW2312358672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.