Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11850269›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002

Plasma protein binding of amphotericin B and pharmacokinetics of bound versus unbound amphotericin B after administration of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate.

Ihor Bekersky, Robert M Fielding, Dawna E Dressler, Jean W Lee, Donald N Buell, Thomas J Walsh

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antifungal pharmacodynamics: Latin America's perspective.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antibiotics and Other Drugs Removal by the CytoSorbAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. In vitro activity of nanoliposomal amphotericin B against terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton indotineae isolates.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ihor BekerskyFujisawa Healthcare, Inc., Deerfield, Illinois 60015-2548, USA. ihor_bekersky@fujisawa.com
Robert M Fielding
Dawna E Dressler
Jean W Lee
Donald N Buell
Thomas J Walsh
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) (liposomal AMB) reduces the toxicity of this antifungal drug. The unique composition of liposomal AMB stabilizes the liposomes, producing higher sustained drug levels in plasma and reducing renal and hepatic excretion. When liposomes release their drug payload, unbound, protein-bound, and liposomal drug pools may exist simultaneously in the body. To determine the amounts of drug in these pools, we developed a procedure to measure unbound AMB in human plasma by ultrafiltration and then used it to characterize AMB binding in vitro and to assess the pharmacokinetics of nonliposomal pools of AMB in a phase IV study of liposomal AMB and AMB deoxycholate in healthy subjects. We confirmed that AMB is highly bound (>95%) in human plasma and showed that both human serum albumin and alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein contribute to this binding. AMB binding exhibited an unusual concentration dependence in plasma: the percentage of bound drug increased as the AMB concentration increased. This was attributed to the low solubility of AMB in plasma, which limits the unbound drug concentration to <1 microg/ml. Subjects given 2 mg of liposomal AMB/kg of body weight had lower exposures (as measured by the maximum concentration of drug in serum and the area under the concentration-time curve) to both unbound and nonliposomal drug than those receiving 0.6 mg of AMB deoxycholate/kg. Most of the AMB in plasma remained liposome associated (97% at 4 h, 55% at 168 h) after liposomal AMB administration, so that unbound drug concentrations remained at <25 ng/ml in all liposomal AMB-treated subjects. Although liposomal AMB markedly reduces the total urinary and fecal recoveries of AMB, urinary and fecal clearances based on unbound AMB were similar (94 to 121 ml h(-1) kg(-1)) for both formulations. Unbound drug urinary clearances were equal to the glomerular filtration rate, and tubular transit rates were <16% of the urinary excretion rate, suggesting that net filtration of unbound drug, with little secretion or reabsorption, is the mechanism of renal clearance for both conventional and liposomal AMB in humans. Unbound drug fecal clearances were also similar for the two formulations. Thus, liposomal AMB increases total AMB concentrations while decreasing unbound AMB concentrations in plasma as a result of sequestration of the drug in long-circulating liposomes.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveBlood ProteinsDeoxycholic AcidDialysisDrug CombinationsFecesHumansInjections, IntravenousLiposomesProtein BindingUltrafiltrationAmphotericin Bamphotericin B, deoxycholate drug combinationAntifungal AgentsBlood ProteinsDeoxycholic AcidDrug Combinationsliposomal amphotericin BLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID11850269
PMCPMC127463
OpenAlexW2115915062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.