Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11839700›Full record

ReviewGut2002

Molecular testing for antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori.

R J Owen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy of 7-day Tailored Therapy forThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prevalence ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Review
  11. Primary Resistance Pattern ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Review
  12. Review of current diagnostic methods and advances inWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R J OwenPHLS Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, UK. rowen@phls.nhs.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated 7.5 million individuals in England and Wales are actively infected with Helicobacter pylori and hence knowledge of local resistance rates is of growing importance. Also, information on strain resistance following treatment failure is crucial in selecting an appropriate regimen as the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics makes retreatment difficult. Molecular test methods may have an impact on improving the availability and accuracy of information on H pylori antimicrobial resistance to guide in the selection of primary as well as secondary backup treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinDrug Resistance, BacterialHelicobacter pyloriHumansMetronidazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID11839700
PMCPMC1773144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.