Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11839182›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2002

Orthology between the genomes of Plasmodium falciparum and rodent malaria parasites: possible practical applications.

A P Waters

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A P WatersDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. waters@lumc.nl
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The work of the consortium that has been formed to complete the entire sequence of the genome of a selected clone of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, is almost finished. Already huge tracts of the genome are available as fully assembled chromosomes or large contigs and the work of initial annotation is in an advanced state. Post-genomic research is in one sense the process of furthering the process of annotation, creating biological atlases and preliminary attempts to make global descriptions of gene transcription and proteome analysis are underway. Comparison between significant amounts of genome data from both closely, and more distantly related organisms, can facilitate the identification of genes themselves, coordinately regulated gene expression groups, gene function and genome organization. Models of malaria can fulfil these functions and in addition provide an experimental system wherein predictions can be tested and basic experimental investigations performed within numerous aspects of disease, pathology, parasite-host and parasite-vector interactions. Comparative genomics in Plasmodium has already been shown to have informative roles in the completion of annotation and the elucidation of gene function. These roles will be illustrated by example and used as the basis for a discussion of the utility of genome information and malaria models in realizing the desired product of Plasmodium genomics, the development of malaria therapies.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ProtozoanAnimalsComputational BiologyDisease Models, AnimalGenes, ProtozoanGenomicsHumansMalaria, FalciparumPlasmodiumProtozoan ProteinsRodentiaProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11839182
PMCPMC1692921
OpenAlexW104892051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.