Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11838460›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2002

Information in context: integrating information specialists into practice settings.

Valerie Florance, Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse, Debra S Ketchell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00226291 (The Clinical Informationist), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00226291 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2004, after this paper: background citation

The Clinical Informationist: Does the Model Work

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt UniversityRan2004 to 2007Enrolled299ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsSynthesized evidence report
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Health Sciences Library Closings; A Context Sensitive Pilot Study.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biological information specialists for biological informatics.Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration · 2007
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The next challenge: where do we go from here?Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2007
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Subject specialization in a liaison librarian program.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2006
    Article
  14. Broad issues to consider for library involvement in bioinformatics.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2006
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A current perspective on medical informatics and health sciences librarianship.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2005
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A model for training the new bioinformationist.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2004
    Article
  19. Evolution of a mature clinical informationist model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valerie FloranceExtramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. floranv@mail.nlm.nih.gov
Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse
Debra S Ketchell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An information need (the problem) cannot be divorced from its context. The problem context determines the urgency, granularity of detail, authority, and level of certainty required for an acceptable answer and dictates the expertise and resources that can be brought to bear. The size and diversity of the sources that can be marshalled during clinical problem solving is cognitively unmanageable--too large and too complex for a single person to process effectively in a constrained timeframe. Can the clinical team, as currently constituted, collectively handle this information-processing task, or is there a need for special information expertise on the team? If there is such a need, what is the best way to prepare information specialists to participate in context-based problem solving? This article explores preparation for work in information-rich, problem-solving environments. The authors provide two case studies, one clinical and one bioscientific, that elucidate knowledge and training requirements for information specialists who work as peers in patient care and research settings.

Indexed as

LibrariansHumansInformation ManagementInformation ServicesInservice TrainingInternetInterprofessional RelationsLibraries, MedicalLibrary ScienceProfessional CompetenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID11838460
PMCPMC64757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.