ReviewJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2002
Bringing the best of medical librarianship to the patient team.
Review in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008Pooled it
- A randomized effectiveness trial of a clinical informatics consult service: impact on evidence-based decision-making and knowledge implementation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIATrial
- Evolution, revolution, or obsolescence: an examination of writings on the future of health sciences libraries.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2012Article
- Exploring clinician adoption of a novel evidence request feature in an electronic medical record system.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008Article
- Focus on performance: the 21 century revolution in medical education.Mens sana monographs · 2008Article
- An evaluation of five bedside information products using a user-centered, task-oriented approach.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2006Article
- In a new element: medical librarians making patient education rounds.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2004Article
- Medical informatics education: an alternative pathway for training informationists.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2002Review
- Who are the informaticians? What we know and should know.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Evolution of a mature clinical informationist model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces a series of articles examining the state of the medical library profession as practiced in the clinical context. It is widely understood that many changes across the spectrum of medical librarianship practice have been brought about by both technological advances and economic realities. These changes have created strains felt by many in the profession. Discussions of evolving roles for medical librarians that have gone on for years have taken on a new sense of urgency, not just because support of library services is at stake, but also because new opportunities, which many are eager to explore, await librarians. In June 2000, an editorial appearing in a mainstream medical journal proposed a reinvention of clinical librarianship that, if designed as presented in the editorial, would have a dramatic effect on current hospital-based library practice. This series of articles was developed in an effort to provide thoughtful consideration of the "informationist" model and to present new ways to look at the core competencies that define the profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11838456PMC64754What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.