The physician-patient relationship in an electronic environment: a regional snapshot.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A training intervention to improve information management in primary care.Family medicine · 2008
   Trial
2. Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2013
   Article
3. The roles of patients' internet use for cancer information and socioeconomic status in oncologist-patient communication.Journal of oncology practice · 2007
   Article
4. Brief report: What types of Internet guidance do patients want from their physicians?Journal of general internal medicine · 2005
   Article
5. Mobile phone apps for family caregivers: A scoping review and qualitative content analysis.Digital health
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as