Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11834460›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2002

The three modern faces of mercury.

Thomas W Clarkson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Evidence on Neurotoxicity after Intrauterine and Childhood Exposure to Organomercurials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas W ClarksonDepartment of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York 14642, USA. tcw30@aol.com

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martha Susiarjo · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
TOXICITY OF METHYL MERCURY IN A FISH EATING POPULATIONR01ES010219 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI VAN WIJNGAARDEN, EDWIN · 2000 to 2019
$11.8M
METHYLMERCURY TRANSPORT ACROSS CELL MEMBRANESR01ES006484 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BALLATORI, NAZZARENO · 1993 to 2005
$1.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES010219NIEHS NIH HHS ES01247NIEHS NIH HHS ES06484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three modern "faces" of mercury are our perceptions of risk from the exposure of billions of people to methyl mercury in fish, mercury vapor from amalgam tooth fillings, and ethyl mercury in the form of thimerosal added as an antiseptic to widely used vaccines. In this article I review human exposure to and the toxicology of each of these three species of mercury. Mechanisms of action are discussed where possible. Key gaps in our current knowledge are identified from the points of view both of risk assessment and of mechanisms of action.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureFishesAnimalsDental AmalgamFood ContaminationHumansMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsPreservatives, PharmaceuticalRisk AssessmentThimerosalVaccinesVolatilizationDental AmalgamMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsPreservatives, PharmaceuticalThimerosalVaccines

Identifiers

PMID11834460
PMCPMC1241144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.