Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11833478›Full record

Trial reportProceedings. AMIA Symposium2001

Neural networks in the assessment of HIV immunopathology.

G Hatzakis, C Tsoukas

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 70% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G HatzakisImmune Deficiency Treatment Center, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
C Tsoukas
McGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surrogate markers are by definition quantifiable laboratory variables that have clinical and biological relevance to disease outcomes. Virologic and immunologic surrogate markers have proven useful in following HIV-associated viral burden, immune dysregulation, dysfunction and deficiency. Monitoring of sequential changes in these markers and their interrelationships may provide significant information about viral-host-drug dynamics. The complexity and fluidity of these changes necessitates that an efficient means be developed for their monitoring. We therefore generated a neural network-based model for assessing host dynamics over time and compared its performance with that of a multiple regression model. Both modeling approaches were applied to the actual, non-filtered, clinical observations on 58 HIV-infected individuals treated consistently with Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART), for a period of over-52 weeks resulting in an average of 16 observations per patient throughout this time span. Results demonstrated that the neural network was at least as accurate as a multi-regression model. Since our dataset was modest in size we also believe that neural networks warrant further consideration for modeling the complexity of HIV-host dynamics on larger datasets.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveNeural Networks, ComputerBiomarkersHIV InfectionsHumansLinear ModelsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID11833478
PMCPMC2243685
OpenAlexW132624122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.