Trial reportProceedings. AMIA Symposium2001
Neural networks in the assessment of HIV immunopathology.
Trial report in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural network-longitudinal assessment of the Electronic Anti-Retroviral THerapy (EARTH) cohort to follow response to HIV-treatment.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2005Article
- Neural networks morbidity and mortality modeling during loss of HIV T-cell homeostasis.Proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surrogate markers are by definition quantifiable laboratory variables that have clinical and biological relevance to disease outcomes. Virologic and immunologic surrogate markers have proven useful in following HIV-associated viral burden, immune dysregulation, dysfunction and deficiency. Monitoring of sequential changes in these markers and their interrelationships may provide significant information about viral-host-drug dynamics. The complexity and fluidity of these changes necessitates that an efficient means be developed for their monitoring. We therefore generated a neural network-based model for assessing host dynamics over time and compared its performance with that of a multiple regression model. Both modeling approaches were applied to the actual, non-filtered, clinical observations on 58 HIV-infected individuals treated consistently with Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART), for a period of over-52 weeks resulting in an average of 16 observations per patient throughout this time span. Results demonstrated that the neural network was at least as accurate as a multi-regression model. Since our dataset was modest in size we also believe that neural networks warrant further consideration for modeling the complexity of HIV-host dynamics on larger datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11833478PMC2243685W132624122What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.