Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11831550›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology

Paradoxical signal transduction in neurobiological systems.

F C Colpaert, Y Frégnac

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Do opioids induce hyperalgesia?].Der Anaesthesist · 2010
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F C ColpaertCentre de Recherche Pierre Fabre 17, Castres, France. francis.colpaert@pierre-fabre.com
Y Frégnac

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information processing in neurobiological systems is commonly thought to rely on the assessment of a signal-to-noise ratio as the key mechanism of signal detection; it assumes and requires that both signal and noise are concurrently available. An alternative theory holds that detection proceeds by the system appreciating any instantaneous input by the input's departure from the moving average of past activity. The evidence reviewed here suggests that this latter transduction mechanism provides a unique, formal account of the highly dynamic, neuroadaptative plasticity (i.e., tolerance, dependence, sensitization) that ensues upon mu-opioid receptor activation. The mechanism would appear already to operate with the receptor-G protein coupling that occurs upon agonist binding to mu-opioid receptors, and also with highly integrated responses such as whole-organism analgesia. The mechanism may perhaps operate ubiquitously with further neuronal and non-neuronal, cell surface, and intracellular-signaling systems, and may govern the experience-dependent regulation of synaptic strength. The transduction mechanism defines a continuously evolving process; the process's most peculiar feature is that it makes any input generate not one but two outcomes that are paradoxical, or opposite in sign.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsHumansNarcoticsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurobiologyNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Opioid, muSignal TransductionAnalgesicsG-substrateNarcoticsNerve Tissue ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID11831550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.