Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11830643›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002

Amplification-mutagenesis: evidence that "directed" adaptive mutation and general hypermutability result from growth with a selected gene amplification.

Heather Hendrickson, E Susan Slechta, Ulfar Bergthorsson, Dan I Andersson, John R Roth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  5. Molecular Detection and Genetic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emergence of Concurrent MultipleJCO precision oncology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Evolution of new functions de novo and from preexisting genes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather HendricksonDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
E Susan Slechta
Ulfar Bergthorsson
Dan I Andersson
John R Roth
University of Utah · USSwedish Institute · SE

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF BACTERIAL CHROMSOME STRUCTURER01GM027068 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROTH, JOHN R · 1985 to 2018
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM27068NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM027068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a particular lac mutant of Escherichia coli starves in the presence of lactose, nongrowing cells appear to direct mutations preferentially to sites that allow growth (adaptive mutation). This observation suggested that growth limitation stimulates mutability. Evidence is provided here that this behavior is actually caused by a standard Darwinian process in which natural selection acts in three sequential steps. First, growth limitation favors growth of a subpopulation with an amplification of the mutant lac gene; next, it favors cells with a lac(+) revertant allele within the amplified array. Finally, it favors loss of mutant copies until a stable haploid lac(+) revertant arises and overgrows the colony. By increasing the lac copy number, selection enhances the likelihood of reversion within each developing clone. This sequence of events appears to direct mutations to useful sites. General mutagenesis is a side-effect of growth with an amplification (SOS induction). The F' plasmid, which carries lac, contributes by stimulating gene duplication and amplification. Selective stress has no direct effect on mutation rate or target specificity, but acts to favor a succession of cell types with progressively improved growth on lactose. The sequence of events--amplification, mutation, segregation--may help to explain both the origins of some cancers and the evolution of new genes under selection.

Indexed as

MutagenesisElectrophoresis, Agar GelEscherichia coliHumansLac OperonLactoseModels, StatisticalMutationNeoplasmsPhenotypePlasmidsTime FactorsLactose

Identifiers

PMID11830643
PMCPMC122336
OpenAlexW2133989673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.