Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11826004›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2002

Evaluation of a rapid PCR-based epidemiological typing method for routine studies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Malcolm D Yates, Francis A Drobniewski, Stuart M Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Relapse or Re-Infection, the Situation of Recurrent Tuberculosis in Eastern China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malcolm D YatesPHLS Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Public Health Laboratory, Dulwich Hospital, East Dulwich Grove, London SE22 8QF, United Kingdom. m_d_yates@hotmail.com
Francis A Drobniewski
Stuart M Wilson
Dulwich Community Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) based on the insertion sequence IS6110 is used to investigate episodes of suspected transmission of infection of tuberculosis but usually takes a number of weeks from receipt of request to obtain a result. Often investigations would benefit from a more rapid method, possibly one containing an amplification step. The method employed uses a simple DNA extraction followed by a PCR step involving a single primer. Restriction enzyme analysis was performed when the patterns obtained from the PCR products were indistinguishable, especially when only single similar-size bands were obtained. The isolates used were strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis submitted for epidemiological investigations as part of (i) possible contact-outbreak (22 episodes involving between 2 and 20 patients), (ii) possible incidents of laboratory cross-contamination (21 episodes), and (iii) possible change in drug resistance pattern or a case of reinfection (1 patient). The PCR products giving similar patterns were then subjected to restriction enzyme analysis. In conclusion it has been shown that this method is rapid, with results within 1 to 2 days of the request being received; is reproducible; and gives the same results as does RFLP. The restriction enzyme analysis stage has improved the efficiency of the technique.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDisease OutbreaksContact TracingDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsTuberculosis, PulmonaryDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID11826004
PMCPMC153374
OpenAlexW2154165355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.