Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11825988›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2002

Frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus lugdunensis in consecutive urine cultures and relationship to urinary tract infection.

D T Haile, J Hughes, E Vetter, P Kohner, R Snyder, R Patel, F R Cockerill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Draft genomes of oneMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Emergence ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  6. A Case Series ofInfection & chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D T HaileMayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Hughes
E Vetter
P Kohner
R Snyder
R Patel
F R Cockerill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports associate Staphylococcus lugdunensis with severe infection in humans. The frequency of this microorganism in urine cultures is unknown. Five hundred isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were recovered from 4,652 consecutive urine specimens submitted for culture to the Mayo Clinic Microbiology Laboratory. Thirty-one (6%) of 500 isolates of CoNS were identified as S. lugdunensis. In no case was S. lugdunensis isolated in pure culture; 29 (94%) of 31 S. lugdunensis isolates were part of mixed nonpathogenic flora. Medical records were reviewed for 30 of the 31 patients from whom these 31 isolates were isolated. Twenty-one (70%) of the 30 evaluable patients were not treated with antibiotics; the remaining 9 (30%) of 30 patients were treated with antibiotics that may be effective against S. lugdunensis. S. lugdunensis may be an unrecognized yet infrequent cause of urinary tract infection.

Indexed as

AgedBacteriological TechniquesCoagulaseCulture MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusUrinary Tract InfectionsUrineCoagulaseCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID11825988
PMCPMC153380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.