Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11825098›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2002

Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of oral cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in patients with stable renal transplants.

Frédéric Leger, Jean Debord, Yann Le Meur, Annick Rousseau, Mathias Büchler, Gérard Lachâtre, Gilles Paintaud, Pierre Marquet

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Analyses of AUCJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frédéric LegerService de Pharmacologie et Toxicologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France. marquet@unilim.fr
Jean Debord
Yann Le Meur
Annick Rousseau
Mathias Büchler
Gérard Lachâtre
Gilles Paintaud
Pierre Marquet
Hôpital Dupuytren · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) Bayesian estimator for the pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporin, based on only three timepoints, and evaluate its performance with respect to a full-profile nonlinear regression approach. PATIENTS: 20 adult patients with stable renal transplants given orally administered microemulsified cyclosporin and mycophenolate.

methodsCyclosporin was assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nonlinear regression and MAP Bayesian estimation were performed using a home-made program and a previously designed pharmacokinetic model including an S-shaped absorption profile described by a gamma distribution. OUTCOME MEASURES AND

resultsMAP Bayesian estimation using the best limited sampling strategy (before administration, and 1 and 3 hours after administration) was compared with nonlinear regression (taken as the reference method) for the prediction of the different pharmacokinetic parameters and exposure indices. Median relative prediction error was -0.49 and -3.42% for area under the concentration-time curve over the administration interval of 12 hours (AUC12) and estimated peak drug concentration (Cmax), respectively (nonsignificant). Relative precision was 2.00 and 4.32%, and correlation coefficient (r) was 0.985 and 0.955, for AUC12 and Cmax, respectively.

conclusionThis paper reports preliminary results in a stable renal transplant patient population, showing that MAP Bayesian estimation can allow accurate prediction of AUC12 and Cmax with only three samples (0, 1 and 3 hours). Although these results require confirmation by further studies in other clinical settings, using other drug combinations, other analytical methods and commercially available pharmacokinetic software, the method seems promising as a tool for the therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin in clinical practice or for exposure-controlled studies.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdministration, OralAdultAgedArea Under CurveBayes TheoremBiological AvailabilityCyclosporineEmulsionsFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedCyclosporineEmulsionsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID11825098
OpenAlexW2004178694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.