Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11824830›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2001

Identification of items which predict later development of depression in primary health care.

K Barkow, R Heun, T B Ustün, W Maier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Somatic symptoms in depression.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2006
    Review
  10. The importance of somatic symptoms in depression in primary care.Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2005
    Article
  11. Duloxetine: A New Treatment for the Emotional and Physical Symptoms of Depression.Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K BarkowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Bonn.
R Heun
T B Ustün
W Maier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve recognition and treatment of depression in primary care it would be advantageous to have criteria for identification of later depression. Only a few studies were performed on primary care samples to examine risk factors for new depressive episodes. These were mostly cross-sectional and did not include psychiatric symptoms as possible predictors. This is the first one-year-follow-up study investigating prospectively psychiatric symptomatology as risk factors for depressive episodes in a primary care sample. An international primary care sample of initially non-depressed subjects (n = 2,445) was examined for the presence of depression (ICD-10) at follow-up. Initial measures addressed presence of psychiatric symptoms according to the CIDI-Primary Health Care Version and sociodemographic variables. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the relationship with the development of new depressive episodes. After one year, 4.4% of primary care patients met ICD-10 criteria for a depressive episode. Logistic regression analysis revealed that symptoms of depression and physical, mainly pain-related symptoms were associated with depression at follow-up. General practitioners therefore should be careful in the consideration of depressive symptoms but also of somatic complaints which might precede depression or mask depressive symptomatology. The present results might be helpful for future development of prediction scales.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesCultureDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID11824830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.