Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11823412›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2002

The connection between transcription and genomic instability.

Andrés Aguilera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 177 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Different classes of genomic inserts contribute to human antibody diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Non-Darwinian Molecular Biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. R-Loops and Its Chro-Mates: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Balancing DNA repair to prevent ageing and cancer.Experimental cell research · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrés AguileraDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla 41012, Spain. aguilo@us.es

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription is a central aspect of DNA metabolism that takes place on the same substrate as replication, repair and recombination. Not surprisingly, therefore, there is a physical and functional connection between these processes. In recent years, transcription has proven to be a relevant player in the maintenance of genome integrity and in the induction of genetic instability and diversity. The aim of this review is to provide an integrative view on how transcription can control different aspects of genomic integrity, by exploring different mechanisms that might be responsible for transcription-associated mutation (TAM) and transcription-associated recombination (TAR).

Indexed as

GenomeMutationRecombination, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID11823412
PMCPMC125829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.