Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11822642›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2001

Implementing evidence in Finnish primary care. Use of electronic guidelines in daily practice.

M Mäkelä, L Kunnamo

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M MäkeläFinnish Office for Health Care Technology Assessment and Medical Society Duodecim, Helsinki.
L Kunnamo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Finland, electronic guidelines have provided general practitioners (GPs) with a source of up-to-date information at their fingertips since 1989. The Physician's Desk Reference and Database (PDRD) covers the majority of problems encountered in primary care with some 1,000 articles. These are available in electronic format, updated every 4 months, and as a book published in a fully revised edition every 2 years. Physicians use these guidelines as a routine part of their daily work. They seek information for both common and rare health problems and use it to plan diagnostic strategies as well as treatment and follow-up. In nearly 90% of cases the doctor finds the information she needs from the guidelines. The electronic version is user-friendly; typically the relevant article is found and read in 2 min. Patients find it reassuring when their doctor uses guidelines to select optimal treatment. Other Nordic countries are aslo producing several national guidelines, but Finland has so far the widest scope and longest experience in this area. An English version of the PDRD guidelines (Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines) is available, and a Swedish-language version will be completed in 2002.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalEvidence-Based MedicinePractice Guidelines as TopicFinlandHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.