ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2001
Implementing evidence in Finnish primary care. Use of electronic guidelines in daily practice.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence-based general practice: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- FAMILY PHYSICIAN OPINIONS ON ELECTRONIC TOOLS AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY, USAGE AND ADHERENCE IN CROATIA.Acta clinica Croatica · 2022Article
- Development of a Tailored Intervention With Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Multi-Method Study.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
- Tailoring implementation strategies for evidence-based recommendations using computerised clinical decision support systems: protocol for the development of the GUIDES tools.Implementation science : IS · 2016Article
- Use of quality improvement methods in Finnish health centres in 1998 and 2003.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Finland, electronic guidelines have provided general practitioners (GPs) with a source of up-to-date information at their fingertips since 1989. The Physician's Desk Reference and Database (PDRD) covers the majority of problems encountered in primary care with some 1,000 articles. These are available in electronic format, updated every 4 months, and as a book published in a fully revised edition every 2 years. Physicians use these guidelines as a routine part of their daily work. They seek information for both common and rare health problems and use it to plan diagnostic strategies as well as treatment and follow-up. In nearly 90% of cases the doctor finds the information she needs from the guidelines. The electronic version is user-friendly; typically the relevant article is found and read in 2 min. Patients find it reassuring when their doctor uses guidelines to select optimal treatment. Other Nordic countries are aslo producing several national guidelines, but Finland has so far the widest scope and longest experience in this area. An English version of the PDRD guidelines (Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines) is available, and a Swedish-language version will be completed in 2002.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11822642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.