Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11815664›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2002

Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods.

Peter D Calvert, Victor I Govardovskii, Vadim Y Arshavsky, Clint L Makino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Functional optical coherence tomography enablesBiomedical optics express · 2020
    Article
  7. Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2016
    Article
  13. Timing is everything: GTPase regulation in phototransduction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Channel modulation and the mechanism of light adaptation in mouse rods.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  19. Kinetics of turn-offs of frog rod phototransduction cascade.The Journal of general physiology · 2008
    Article
  20. Light adaptation in salamander L-cone photoreceptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter D CalvertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA 02114, USA. pdcalvert@meei.harvard.edu
Victor I Govardovskii
Vadim Y Arshavsky
Clint L Makino

Funding

Viral ModuleP30EY012196 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI MARGARET S LIVINGSTONE · 1998 to 2026
$21.3M
Transducin movement and photoreceptor light adaptationR01EY010336 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI ARSHAVSKY, VADIM Y · 1994 to 2012
$6.3M
Light Adaptation in Vertebrate Rod PhotoreceptorsR01EY012944 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI MAKINO, CLINT L · 2001 to 2005
$1.3M
PROLONGED RESPONSE IMPACT &ROD PHOTORECEPTOR ADAPTATIONF32EY006857 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI CALVERT, PETER DEANE · 1997 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS EY06857NEI NIH HHS EY10336NEI NIH HHS EY12944NEI NIH HHS F32 EY006857NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012196NEI NIH HHS P30 EY12196NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010336NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate rod photoreceptors adjust their sensitivity as they adapt during exposure to steady light. Light adaptation prevents the rod from saturating and significantly extends its dynamic range. We examined the time course of the onset of light adaptation in bullfrog rods and compared it with the projected onset of feedback reactions thought to underlie light adaptation on the molecular level. We found that adaptation developed in two distinct temporal phases: (1) a fast phase that operated within seconds after the onset of illumination, which is consistent with most previous reports of a 1-2-s time constant for the onset of adaptation; and (2) a slow phase that engaged over tens of seconds of continuous illumination. The fast phase desensitized the rods as much as 80-fold, and was observed at every light intensity tested. The slow phase was observed only at light intensities that suppressed more than half of the dark current. It provided an additional sensitivity loss of up to 40-fold before the rod saturated. Thus, rods achieved a total degree of adaptation of approximately 3,000-fold. Although the fast adaptation is likely to originate from the well characterized Ca(2+)-dependent feedback mechanisms regulating the activities of several phototransduction cascade components, the molecular mechanism underlying slow adaptation is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that the slow adaptation phase is mediated by cGMP dissociation from noncatalytic binding sites on the cGMP phosphodiesterase, which has been shown to reduce the lifetime of activated phosphodiesterase in vitro. Although cGMP dissociated from the noncatalytic binding sites in intact rods with kinetics approximating that for the slow adaptation phase, this hypothesis was ruled out because the intensity of light required for cGMP dissociation far exceeded that required to evoke the slow phase. Other possible mechanisms are discussed.

Indexed as

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP PhosphodiesterasesAdaptation, OcularAnimalsIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsLightModels, BiologicalRana catesbeianaRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsTime Factors3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases

Identifiers

PMID11815664
PMCPMC2233805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.