Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11810953›Full record

ReviewAlcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism2001

Estimating the prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome. A summary.

P A May, J P Gossage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Brief intervention for alcohol use by pregnant women.American journal of public health · 2007
    Trial
  9. Preventing alcohol-exposed pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial.American journal of preventive medicine · 2007
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P A MayUniversity of New Mexico Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA), Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
J P Gossage

Funding

TRIAL OF FAS PREVENTION IN AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITIESR01AA011685 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MAY, PHILIP ALAN · 1998 to 2001
$3.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA-11685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the late 1970s, many studies have reported on the prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), alcohol-related birth defects (ARBD), and alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorders (ARND). The three main types of research methods used in these studies are passive surveillance, clinic-based studies, and active case ascertainment. This article describes each of these methods, including their strengths and weaknesses, and summarizes the estimated prevalence of FAS produced by each of these approaches. The maternal risk factors associated with FAS and other alcohol-related anomalies include advanced maternal age, low socioeconomic status, frequent binge drinking, family and friends with drinking problems, and poor social and psychological indicators. Overall, the available literature points to a prevalence rate of FAS of 0.5 to 2 cases per 1,000 births in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesAbnormalities, Drug-InducedChildDevelopmental DisabilitiesEthanolFemaleFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersHumansPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesEthanol

Identifiers

PMID11810953
PMCPMC6707173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.