Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11809822›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2002

Testing a mathematical model of the yeast cell cycle.

Frederick R Cross, Vincent Archambault, Mary Miller, Martha Klovstad

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 264 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The bistable mitotic switch in fission yeast.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mad3 modulates the GScience advances · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ultrasensitivity and bistability in covalent-modification cycles with positive autoregulation.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A hybrid stochastic model of the budding yeast cell cycle.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Multisite phosphorylation code of CDK.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederick R CrossThe Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021, USA. fcross@rockvax.rockefeller.edu
Vincent Archambault
Mary Miller
Martha Klovstad
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF CYCLIN FUNCTION AT CELL CYCLE INITIATIONR01GM047238 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 1993 to 2010
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 47238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We derived novel, testable predictions from a mathematical model of the budding yeast cell cycle. A key qualitative prediction of bistability was confirmed in a strain simultaneously lacking cdc14 and G1 cyclins. The model correctly predicted quantitative dependence of cell size on gene dosage of the G1 cyclin CLN3, but it incorrectly predicted strong genetic interactions between G1 cyclins and the anaphase-promoting complex specificity factor Cdh1. To provide constraints on model generation, we determined accurate concentrations for the abundance of all nine cyclins as well as the inhibitor Sic1 and the catalytic subunit Cdc28. For many of these we determined abundance throughout the cell cycle by centrifugal elutriation, in the presence or absence of Cdh1. In addition, perturbations to the Clb-kinase oscillator were introduced, and the effects on cyclin and Sic1 levels were compared between model and experiment. Reasonable agreement was obtained in many of these experiments, but significant experimental discrepancies from the model predictions were also observed. Thus, the model is a strong but incomplete attempt at a realistic representation of cell cycle control. Constraints of the sort developed here will be important in development of a truly predictive model.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCDC28 Protein Kinase, S cerevisiaeCell CycleCell SizeCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ProteinsCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsEscherichia coliFungal ProteinsGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalGenotypeMathematical ComputingMitosisCDC28 Protein Kinase, S cerevisiaeCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ProteinsCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsFungal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSIC1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID11809822
PMCPMC65072
OpenAlexW2150767223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.