Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11809642›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002

Fusidic acid cream in the treatment of impetigo in general practice: double blind randomised placebo controlled trial.

Sander Koning, Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit, Jan L Nouwen, Cees M Verduin, Roos M D Bernsen, Arnold P Oranje, Siep Thomas, Johannes C van der Wouden

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for impetigo.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for impetigo.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Staphylococcus aureus carriage among GPs in The Netherlands.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  12. [Pediatric dermatology. New aspects of bacterial skin infections in children].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.Archives of disease in childhood · 2004
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sander KoningDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Rotterdam, Room Ff325, PO Box 1738, Erasmus University, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit
Jan L Nouwen
Cees M Verduin
Roos M D Bernsen
Arnold P Oranje
Siep Thomas
Johannes C van der Wouden
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the hypothesis that fusidic acid would not increase the treatment effect of disinfecting with povidone-iodine alone in children with impetigo.

designRandomised placebo controlled trial.

settingGeneral practices in Greater Rotterdam.

participants184 children aged 0-12 years with impetigo.

main outcome measuresClinical cure and bacterial cure after one week.

resultsAfter one week of treatment 55% of the patients in the fusidic acid group were clinically cured compared with 13% in the placebo group (odds ratio 12.6, 95% confidence interval 5.0 to 31.5, number needed to treat 2.3). After two weeks and four weeks the differences in cure rates between the two groups had become smaller. More children in the placebo group were non-compliant (12 v 5) and received extra antibiotic treatment (11 v 3), and more children in the placebo group reported adverse effects (19 v 7). Staphylococcus aureus was found in 96% of the positive cultures; no strains were resistant to fusidic acid.

conclusionsFusidic acid is much more effective than placebo (when both are given in combination with povidone-iodine shampoo) in the treatment of impetigo. Because of the low rate of cure and high rate of adverse events in the placebo group, the value of povidone-iodine in impetigo can be questioned.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFamily PracticeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFusidic AcidHumansImpetigoInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalFusidic AcidOintmentsPovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID11809642
PMCPMC64791
OpenAlexW2133982391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.