Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11808778›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2001

Reversibility of high pressure effects on the contractility of skeletal muscle.

K R Kress, O Friedrich, H Ludwig, R H Fink

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K R KressInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
O Friedrich
H Ludwig
R H Fink
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High pressure application has been extensively used to thermodynamically influence complex physiological processes such as membrane ion conductances and the mechanism of muscle contraction. However, little is known about the reversibility of high pressure effects on intact cells. Therefore, we studied the reversibility of 3 h pressure applications up to 25 MPa at +4 degrees C to intact murine skeletal muscle. Functional mechanical properties were tested in extensor digitorum muscle fibres skinned following a high pressure exposure. Calcium activated force and stiffness were nearly unchanged following pressure applications up to 20 MPa, whereas for higher pressures we found a marked reduction of peak force, a decline of activation kinetics, an increase of relaxation stiffness but still unchanged peak stiffness. The rigor kinetics showed a similar behaviour as the activation kinetics. pCa-force relations remained unchanged up to 20 MPa but were shifted towards smaller pCa values for higher pressures. In conclusion there is a rather sharp high pressure limit of 20 MPa above of which pressure application results in a substantial irreversible loss of contractile functionality in differentiated muscle which may at least partly be explained by changes in the Ca2+ regulatory process. This is supported by a degradation of the 37 kDa band, i.e. Troponin T, shown by SDS gel electrophoresis. However, the general stability of the other bands does not indicate a substantial increase of unspecific protease activity following a high pressure treatment up to 25 MPa.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPressureThermodynamicsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID11808778
OpenAlexW2154875904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.