Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11801723›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2002

Mammalian nuclei become licensed for DNA replication during late telophase.

Daniela S Dimitrova, Tatyana A Prokhorova, J Julian Blow, Ivan T Todorov, David M Gilbert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lgr5The Journal of cell biology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela S DimitrovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. dsd7@acsu.buffalo.edu
Tatyana A Prokhorova
J Julian Blow
Ivan T Todorov
David M Gilbert
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Specification of Mammalian Replication OriginsR01GM057233 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GILBERT, DAVID M · 1998 to 2005
$1.8M
Cancer Research UK A2335NIGMS NIH HHS GM57233-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mcm 2-7 are essential replication proteins that bind to chromatin in mammalian nuclei during late telophase. Here, we have investigated the relationship between Mcm binding, licensing of chromatin for replication, and specification of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) replication origin. Approximately 20% of total Mcm3 protein was bound to chromatin in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during telophase, while an additional 25% bound gradually and cumulatively throughout G1-phase. To investigate the functional significance of this binding, nuclei prepared from CHO cells synchronized at various times after metaphase were introduced into Xenopus egg extracts, which were either immunodepleted of Mcm proteins or supplemented with geminin, an inhibitor of the Mcm-loading protein Cdt1. Within 1 hour after metaphase, coincident with completion of nuclear envelope formation, CHO nuclei were fully competent to replicate in both of these licensing-defective extracts. However, sites of initiation of replication in each of these extracts were found to be dispersed throughout the DHFR locus within nuclei isolated between 1 to 5 hours after metaphase, but became focused to the DHFR origin within nuclei isolated after 5 hours post-metaphase. Importantly, introduction of permeabilized post-ODP, but not pre-ODP, CHO nuclei into licensing-deficient Xenopus egg extracts resulted in the preservation of a significant degree of DHFR origin specificity, implying that the previously documented lack of specific origin selection in permeabilized nuclei is at least partially due to the licensing of new initiation sites by proteins in the Xenopus egg extracts. We conclude that the functional association of Mcm proteins with chromatin (i.e. replication licensing) in CHO cells takes place during telophase, several hours prior to the specification of replication origins at the DHFR locus.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCell Cycle ProteinsCell ExtractsCell FractionationCell NucleusCHO CellsChromatinCricetinaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationFemaleG1 PhaseGemininMammalsNuclear ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell ExtractsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsGemininGMNN protein, XenopusNuclear ProteinsTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11801723
PMCPMC1255924
OpenAlexW1896375581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.