ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002
Redesigning cancer care.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009Pooled it
- Facing the Global Challenges of Access to Cancer Medication.Journal of global oncology · 2018Review
- Delayed initiation of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: how important is it to push to the front (or the back) of the line?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2011Review
- Views of psycho-oncology health professionals on priority psycho-oncology research questions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011Article
- Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesign: a multiple case study.Implementation science : IS · 2010Article
- Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010Article
- Cancer care in the United Kingdom: new solutions are needed.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Review
- Redesigning mental health services: lessons on user involvement from the Mental Health Collaborative.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2003Article
- Booked inpatient admissions and hospital capacity. Mathematical model misses the point.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
- Waiting in the NHS: part 1--a diagnosis.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2002Article
- Managing differentiated thyroid cancer.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with cancer in the UK suffer more delays and worse survival than those in many other European states. The national cancer plan has set ambitious targets for improved care. The cancer services collaborative is using improvement methods to reduce delays and improve the service for patients. The nine cancer networks using these methods have cut waiting times and improved patients' experiences of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.