Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11796572›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2002

Strain-dependent differences in the regulatory roles of sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus.

Jon S Blevins, Karen E Beenken, Mohamed O Elasri, Barry K Hurlburt, Mark S Smeltzer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Response ofJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  4. Presence and mRNA Expression of theIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. New Weapons to Fight againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Effect of Essential Oil fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The gene regulatory network ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The Impacts ofInfection and immunity · 2020
    Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jon S BlevinsDepartment of Microbiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
Karen E Beenken
Mohamed O Elasri
Barry K Hurlburt
Mark S Smeltzer
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

SAR-MEDIATED REGULATION IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUSR01AI043356 · NIAID · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SMELTZER, MARK S · 1998 to 2008
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI43356NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accessory gene regulator (agr) and the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) are central regulatory elements that control the production of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors. To date, the functions of these loci have been defined almost exclusively using RN6390, which is representative of the laboratory strain 8325-4. However, RN6390 was recently shown to have a mutation in rsbU that results in a phenotype resembling that of a sigB mutant (I. Kullik et al., J. Bacteriol. 180:4814-4820, 1998). For that reason, it remains unclear whether the regulatory events defined in RN6390 are representative of the events that take place in clinical isolates of S. aureus. To address this issue, we generated mutations in the sarA and agr loci of three laboratory strains (RN6390, Newman, and S6C) and four clinical isolates (UAMS-1, UAMS-601, DB, and SC-1). Mutation of sarA in the cna-positive strains UAMS-1 and UAMS-601 resulted in an increased capacity to bind collagen, while mutation of agr had little impact. Northern blot analysis confirmed that the increase in collagen binding was due to increased cna transcription. Without exception, mutation of sarA resulted in increased production of proteases and a decreased capacity to bind fibronectin. Mutation of agr had the opposite effect. Although mutation of sarA resulted in a slight reduction in fnbA transcription, changes in the ability to bind fibronectin appeared to be more directly correlated with changes in protease activity. Lipase production was reduced in both sarA and agr mutants. While mutation of sarA in RN6390 resulted in reduced hemolytic activity, it had the opposite effect in all other strains. There appeared to be reduced levels of the sarC transcript in RN6390, but there was no difference in the overall pattern of sar transcription or the production of SarA. Although mutation of sarA resulted in decreased RNAIII transcription, this effect was not evident under all growth conditions. Taken together, these results suggest that studies defining the regulatory roles of sarA and agr by using RN6390 are not always representative of the events that occur in clinical isolates of S. aureus.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAdhesins, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCollagenFibronectinsHemolysin ProteinsHemolysisLipaseRNA, AntisenseRNA, BacterialSerine EndopeptidasesStaphylococcus aureusTrans-ActivatorsTranscription, GeneticAdhesins, Bacterialadhesin, Staphylococcus aureusAgr protein, Staphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCollagenfibronectin-binding proteins, bacterialFibronectinsHemolysin ProteinsLipaseRNA, AntisenseRNA, BacterialRNAIII, Staphylococcus aureusSarA protein, bacterialSerine EndopeptidasesTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID11796572
PMCPMC127691
OpenAlexW2155419526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.