Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11796357›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of caspofungin versus amphotericin B for treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiases.

Eduardo G Arathoon, Eduardo Gotuzzo, L Miguel Noriega, Rayanne S Berman, Mark J DiNubile, Carole A Sable

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00388167 (PROCAS), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00388167 completednot on this mapstarted 2004, after this paper: background citation

PROCAS: Study Observational Prospective and Multicenter to Determine the Clinic Effectiveness and the Safety of Caspofungin Acetate (CANCIDAS®) in the Treatment of Invader Fungal Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorPETHEMA FoundationRan2004 to 2008Enrolled320ConditionsCandidiasis, AspergillosisArmsCaspofungin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Tissue penetration of antifungal agents.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Eduardo G ArathoonHospital General San Juan de Dios, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Eduardo Gotuzzo
L Miguel Noriega
Rayanne S Berman
Mark J DiNubile
Carole A Sable
United States Military Academy · USComplejo Asistencial Sótero del Río · CLHospital General San Juan de Dios · GTHospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caspofungin is an antifungal agent of the novel echinocandin class. We investigated its efficacy, safety, and tolerability as therapy for oropharyngeal and/or esophageal candidiasis in a phase II dose-ranging study. Patients were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either caspofungin acetate (35, 50, or 70 mg) or amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg of body weight) intravenously once daily for 7 to 14 days. A favorable response required both complete resolution of symptoms and quantifiable improvement of mucosal lesions 3 to 4 days after discontinuation of study drug. Efficacy was assessed using a modified intent-to-treat analysis. No hypothesis testing of efficacy was planned or performed. Of 140 enrolled patients, 63% had esophageal involvement and 98% were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (median CD4 count, 30/mm(3)). A modestly higher proportion of patients in each of the caspofungin groups (74 to 91%) achieved favorable responses compared to amphotericin B recipients (63%), but there was considerable overlap in the 95% confidence intervals surrounding these point estimates. Similar trends were found in the subgroups with esophageal involvement, a history of fluconazole failure, and CD4 counts of < or =50/mm(3). A smaller proportion of patients receiving any dose of caspofungin experienced drug-related adverse events compared to patients given standard doses of conventional amphotericin B (P < 0.01). Caspofungin provided a generally well-tolerated parenteral therapeutic option for HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal and/or esophageal candidiasis in this study.

Indexed as

PeptidesPeptides, CyclicAdolescentAdultAgedAmphotericin BAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCandidiasisCaspofunginDouble-Blind MethodDrug ToleranceEchinocandinsEsophageal DiseasesFemaleHumansAmphotericin BAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesPeptidesPeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID11796357
PMCPMC127070
OpenAlexW2156228013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.