Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002
Patient and carer satisfaction with 'hospital at home': quantitative and qualitative results from a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05360914 (Improving and Evaluation of a New Cross-sectoral Hospital at Home Model for Elderly Acute Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving and Evaluation of a New Cross-sectoral Hospital at Home Model for Elderly Acute Ill Patients
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virtual healthcare compared to hospital care for acute and post-acute illness in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Supporting older people through Hospital at Home care: a systematic review of patient, carer and healthcare professionals' perspectives.Age and ageing · 2025Pooled it
- Dimensions and components of hospital-at-home care: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Inpatient-level care at home delivered by virtual wards and hospital at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions and their components.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Factors influencing the implementation of early discharge hospital at home and admission avoidance hospital at home: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Perceptions of Hospital-at-Home Among Stakeholders: a Meta-synthesis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: a Qualitative Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- Communication strategies amongst healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers in Hospital-at-Home Admission Avoidance models for acutely ill older adults: a scoping review.European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- The FHJ debate: There is no evidence for the drive towards virtual wards.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Intrathecal pump refills at home or at the hospital: Protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial-The IMPROVE study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Hospital at home for elderly acute patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Family caregiver involvement and role in hospital at home for adults: the patients' and family caregivers' perspective - a Norwegian qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Staff Successes and Challenges with Telecommunications-Facilitated Patient Care in Hybrid Hospital-at-Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hospital at home: emergence of a high-value model of care delivery.The Egyptian journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Hospital-at-Home: Multistakeholder Considerations for Program Dissemination and Scale.The Milbank quarterly · 2022Article
- Overall patient experience with a virtual hybrid hospital at home program.SAGE open medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background'Hospital At Home' schemes are set to increase in the United Kingdom (UK) in response to the NHS Plan. To date, little detailed work has been done on the acceptability of these schemes to patients and their carers.
aimTo compare Hospital at Home patient and carer satisfaction with hospital care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
settingConsecutive patients assessed as suitablefor the Leicester Hospital at Home scheme were randomised to Hospital at Home or one of three acute hospitals in the city.
methodPatient satisfaction was assessed two weeks after randomisation, or at discharge if later using a six-item questionnaire. Patients' and carers' views of the services were assessed by semistructured interviews.
resultsOne hundred and two patients were randomised to Hospital at Home and 97 to hospital. Forty-eight (47%) patients in the Hospital at Home arm and 35 (36%) in the hospital arm completed the satisfaction questionnaire, representing 96% and 85% of those eligible, respectively. Total scores were significantly higher in the Hospital at Home (median = 15) than in the hospital group (median = 12). (P<0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test.) Responses to all six questions favoured Hospital at Home, with all but one of these differences being statistically significant. In the Hospital at Homegroup, 24 patients and 18 of their carers were interviewed; in the hospital group 18 patients and seven of their carers were interviewed. Themes emerging from these interviews were that patients appreciated the more personal care and better communication offered by Hospital at Home and placed great value on staying at home, which was seen to be therapeutic. Patients largely felt safe in Hospital at Home, although some would have felt safer in hospital. Some patients and carers felt that better medical care would have been provided in hospital. Carers felt that the workload imposed by Hospital at Home was no greater than by hospital admission and that the relief from care duties at home would be counterbalanced by the added strain of hospital visiting.
conclusionsPatient satisfaction was greater with Hospital at Home than with hospital. Reasons included a more personal style of care and a feeling that staying at home was therapeutic. Carers did not feel that Hospital at Home imposed an extra workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11791829PMC1314211W16156281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.