Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11791829›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002

Patient and carer satisfaction with 'hospital at home': quantitative and qualitative results from a randomised controlled trial.

Andrew Wilson, Alison Wynn, Hilda Parker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05360914 (Improving and Evaluation of a New Cross-sectoral Hospital at Home Model for Elderly Acute Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05360914 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Improving and Evaluation of a New Cross-sectoral Hospital at Home Model for Elderly Acute Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorDefactum, Central Denmark RegionRan2022 to 2027Enrolled849ConditionsCystitis, Erysipelas, PneumoniaArmsHospital at Home (HaH) treatment, Standard hospital admission
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Admission avoidance hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hospital at home: emergence of a high-value model of care delivery.The Egyptian journal of internal medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andrew WilsonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester. aw7@le.ac.uk
Alison Wynn
Hilda Parker
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'Hospital At Home' schemes are set to increase in the United Kingdom (UK) in response to the NHS Plan. To date, little detailed work has been done on the acceptability of these schemes to patients and their carers.

aimTo compare Hospital at Home patient and carer satisfaction with hospital care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

settingConsecutive patients assessed as suitablefor the Leicester Hospital at Home scheme were randomised to Hospital at Home or one of three acute hospitals in the city.

methodPatient satisfaction was assessed two weeks after randomisation, or at discharge if later using a six-item questionnaire. Patients' and carers' views of the services were assessed by semistructured interviews.

resultsOne hundred and two patients were randomised to Hospital at Home and 97 to hospital. Forty-eight (47%) patients in the Hospital at Home arm and 35 (36%) in the hospital arm completed the satisfaction questionnaire, representing 96% and 85% of those eligible, respectively. Total scores were significantly higher in the Hospital at Home (median = 15) than in the hospital group (median = 12). (P<0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test.) Responses to all six questions favoured Hospital at Home, with all but one of these differences being statistically significant. In the Hospital at Homegroup, 24 patients and 18 of their carers were interviewed; in the hospital group 18 patients and seven of their carers were interviewed. Themes emerging from these interviews were that patients appreciated the more personal care and better communication offered by Hospital at Home and placed great value on staying at home, which was seen to be therapeutic. Patients largely felt safe in Hospital at Home, although some would have felt safer in hospital. Some patients and carers felt that better medical care would have been provided in hospital. Carers felt that the workload imposed by Hospital at Home was no greater than by hospital admission and that the relief from care duties at home would be counterbalanced by the added strain of hospital visiting.

conclusionsPatient satisfaction was greater with Hospital at Home than with hospital. Reasons included a more personal style of care and a feeling that staying at home was therapeutic. Carers did not feel that Hospital at Home imposed an extra workload.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthCaregiversFemaleHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHumansMalePatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID11791829
PMCPMC1314211
OpenAlexW16156281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.