Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11788718›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2002

Investigation of a conserved stacking interaction in target site recognition by the U1A protein.

Jerome C Shiels, Jacob B Tuite, Scott J Nolan, Anne M Baranger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A simple ligand that selectively targets CUG trinucleotide repeats and inhibits MBNL protein binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A single intermolecular contact mediates intramolecular stabilization of both RNA and protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerome C ShielsDepartment of Chemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.
Jacob B Tuite
Scott J Nolan
Anne M Baranger
Wesleyan University · US

Funding

DOCTORAL STUDIES IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008271 · NIGMS · WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY · PI BEVERIDGE, DAVID LEWIS · 1988 to 2015
$1.8M
BIOORGANIC BASIS FOR RNA/PROTEIN STABILITYR01GM056857 · NIGMS · WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY · PI BARANGER, ANNE M · 1998 to 2006
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-08271NIGMS NIH HHS GM-56857NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056857NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three highly conserved aromatic residues in RNA recognition motifs (RRM) participate in stacking interactions with RNA bases upon binding RNA. We have investigated the contribution of one of these aromatic residues, Phe56, to the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the spliceosomal protein U1A and stem-loop 2 of U1 snRNA. Previous work showed that the aromatic group is important for high affinity binding. Here we probe how mutation of Phe56 affects the kinetics of complex dissociation, the strength of the hydrogen bonds formed between U1A and the base that stacks with Phe56 (A6) and specific target site recognition. Substitution of Phe56 with Trp or Tyr increased the rate of dissociation of the complex, consistent with previously reported results. However, substitution of Phe56 with His decreased the rate of complex association, implying a change in the initial formation of the complex. Simultaneous modification of residue 56 and A6 revealed energetic coupling between the aromatic group and the functional groups of A6 that hydrogen bond to U1A. Finally, mutation of Phe56 to Leu reduced the ability of U1A to recognize stem-loop 2 correctly. Taken together, these experiments suggest that Phe56 contributes to binding affinity by stacking with A6 and participating in networks of energetically coupled interactions that enable this conserved aromatic amino acid to play a complex role in target site recognition.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationAmino Acid MotifsBase SequenceBinding SitesConserved SequenceCrystallography, X-RayHydrogen BondingKineticsModels, MolecularMutationNucleic Acid DenaturationPeptide FragmentsPhenylalanineProtein BindingProtein ConformationRibonucleoprotein, U1 Small NuclearPeptide FragmentsPhenylalanineRibonucleoprotein, U1 Small NuclearRNARNA-Binding ProteinsU1A proteinUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID11788718
PMCPMC99821
OpenAlexW2133350967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.