ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2002
Mechanical and electrophysiological effects of endothelin-1 on guinea-pig isolated lower oesophageal sphincter circular smooth muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical and electrophysiological effects of endothelin-1 on guinea-pig isolated lower oesophageal sphincter circular smooth muscle.British journal of pharmacology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
1. The effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on guinea-pig lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) circular smooth muscle were investigated by using intracellular microelectrodes and isometric tension recording techniques. 2. ET-1 produced biphasic mechanical responses; an initial transient relaxation followed by a sustained contraction. The initial relaxation was not inhibited by either tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 microM) or L-N(G)-nitroarginine (L-NOARG, 100 microM). The sustained contraction was greatly attenuated by nifedipine (1 microM). 3. ET-1 (1 - 30 nM) induced a concentration-dependent hyperpolarisation that was unaffected by TTX or L-NOARG. The ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ123 (0.3 microM) abolished the ET-1-induced hyperpolarisation, whereas the ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ788 (0.3 microM) had no detectable effect. Sarafotoxin S6c (10 nM) did not change the membrane potential. 4. The ET-1-induced hyperpolarisation was abolished by apamin (0.1 microM). Interestingly, apamin abolished the ET-1-induced transient relaxation but potentiated the sustained contraction. 5. In Ca(2+)-free Krebs solution, the ET-1-induced hyperpolarisation was greatly attenuated and returned to the control value when the tissue was reperfused with Krebs solution containing Ca(2+). The ET-1-induced hyperpolarisation was insensitive to nifedipine but was attenuated by SK&F 96365 (1 - [beta-[3-(4 - methoxy - phenyl)propoxy] - 4 - methoxyphenethyl] - 1H-imidazole hydrochloride, 50 microM), an inhibitor of receptor-mediated Ca(2+) entry. The residual component of the ET-1-induced hyperpolarisation was sensitive to thapsigargin (1 microM). 6. These results demonstrate that, in guinea-pig LOS circular smooth muscle, ET-1 hyperpolarizes the membrane by activating apamin-sensitive K(+) channels, mainly as a result of receptor-mediated Ca(2+) entry and partly by Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. The hyperpolarisation triggers the initial transient relaxation, which acts to oppose the sustained contraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.