ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2001
Identifying and slowing progressive chronic renal failure.
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment and modeling of routinely used biochemical laboratory data of healthy individuals and end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients by three different chemometric methods.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2013Article
- Late referral for assessment of renal failure.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2005Article
- Nephrology: 4. Strategies for the care of adults with chronic kidney disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo help inform primary care physicians about how to identify and slow progressive chronic renal failure. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: The National Library of Medicine (1996 to 2000) was searched using PubMed with search terms pertinent to studies on identification, course, and management of chronic renal failure. References in retrieved papers and older literature known to the authors supplemented the searches. In general, sufficient high-quality studies, systematic reviews, or guidelines based on such evidence were available to support our main points. MAIN MESSAGE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) poses a large and growing morbidity, mortality, and financial burden. Almost all patients reach ESRD as a result of chronic progressive conditions, particularly diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive-vascular renal disease, and glomerular disorders. Patients at risk merit regular renal assessment with serum creatinine tests and urinalysis. Persistent high blood pressure and heavy proteinuria are the strongest predictors of progression of chronic renal failure. Patients with renal disease should be examined and treated for vascular disease and vice versa. Blood pressure lowering, ACE inhibition, and avoidance of further renal insults (such as use of nephrotoxins) can slow the decline of renal function. Restricting dietary protein has a weak effect on slowing renal failure and is not easy to apply in primary care. Timely involvement of specialized nephrology teams is important.
conclusionFamily physicians play an important role in recognizing patients with potential for renal failure, in demonstrating progressive chronic renal failure, and in initiating therapy early to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11785282PMC2018474W2122163768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.