Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11779388›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2001

Zanamivir: from drug design to the clinic.

M Elliott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeted recruitment of immune effector cells for rapid eradication of influenza virus infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Antiviral Approaches against Influenza Virus.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Influenza is now a preventable disease.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2006
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M ElliottGlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. me56167@gsk.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the neuraminidase inhibitors has revolutionized the management options for influenza. Zanamivir was the first such inhibitor to be approved for the treatment of influenza in humans. It is delivered by inhalation to the respiratory tract, which is the site of viral replication, in order to ensure immediate antiviral activity. Early treatment with zanamivir in clinical trials rapidly reduced the severity and duration of influenza symptoms and associated complications. Furthermore, chemoprophylaxis with zanamivir was shown to be effective in the prevention of influenza illness. To date, there is no evidence for the emergence of clinically significant zanamivir-resistant isolates. In conclusion, zanamivir offers a useful complementary strategy to vaccination in the effective management of influenza.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsChemopreventionClinical Trials as TopicDrug DesignDrug InteractionsDrug Resistance, Multiple, ViralEnzyme InhibitorsGuanidinesHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanNeuraminidasePyransSialic AcidsAntiviral AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsGuanidinesNeuraminidasePyransSialic AcidsZanamivir

Identifiers

PMID11779388
PMCPMC1088565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.