Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11773310›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2002

Orthostatic intolerance after space flight.

Wouter Wieling, John R Halliwill, John M Karemaker

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Spaceflight-induced contractile and mitochondrial dysfunction in an automated heart-on-a-chip platform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system responses and orthostatic intolerance in astronauts and their relevance in daily medicine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wouter WielingDepartment of Internal Medicine, Room F4-221, Academic Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.w.weiling@amc.uva.nl
John R Halliwill
John M Karemaker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologists have always been challenged by the adjustments of the human body to hostile environments. The set of papers in this issue of The Journal of Physiology (Cox et al. 2002; Ertl et al. 2002; Levine et al. 2002) fits into the tradition of the study of human responses to extreme physical circumstances. The Neurolab project represents a huge undertaking that required major contributions from many different collaborators, and the coordination of efforts at different institutions. The studies succeeded because of the dedication and years of work of the astronauts involved. The manuscripts present the fundamental findings from the first direct recordings of sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerves and noradrenaline kinetics in humans during microgravity. Despite the difficulties of performing such measurements on the space shuttle and the small numbers of astronauts involved, unique data are set forth that represent a major advance in our understanding of the physiology of space flight.

Indexed as

Space FlightAdaptation, PhysiologicalHumansPosture

Identifiers

PMID11773310
PMCPMC2290012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.